![]() For example, on the RP, Canon opted to remove 24 fps when shooting video at 1080p, remove 30 fps and Dual Pixel autofocus when shooting in 4K, and withhold C-Log. As a result, there’s very little that this combination inside the EOS RP can’t achieve in comparison to the EOS R, so instead of being able to build in limitations because of individual components, Canon is instead obliged to deliberately cripple certain features so that the RP doesn’t undermine the other cameras that it has for sale (or is planning for the future). The recently announced EOS RP offers an insight into why all of this might be a problem.įor its budget full-frame mirrorless camera, Canon opted to use the sensor from the 6D Mark II and coupled it with the DIGIC 8, the processor from the 5D Mark IV and also used in the EOS R, Canon's first and currently flagship mirrorless camera. With mirrorless, making those variations is not so simple, especially when you consider how the number of megapixels has plateaued in the last few years. ![]() Canon's Capacity to Crippleįor Canon, varying the frame rate, sensor size, and autofocus features made sense because they were all governed by different factors. When you also consider that the sensor curtains can be eliminated completely, suddenly we’re seeing frame rates of 30 frames per second and beyond. Plus, there’s no longer that giant mirror that needs to be flapped out of the way, allowing higher frame rates with less effort. By contrast, with mirrorless cameras, autofocus is all about the sensor so there’s no separate batch of autofocus sensors doing the work, so not much opportunity for trimming. Another example: frame rate is governed by the tiny servo that flips the mirror out of the way to allow an exposure, and putting a slower motor in is also a simple task. In a DSLR, the autofocus sensors sit separately from the sensor, gathering information from a secondary mirror, so stripping a couple of those away is relatively straightforward fewer autofocus sensors, cheaper camera. With DSLRs, offering a range of features was easy because so much of it is governed by physical aspects such as the number of autofocus sensors and the frame rate. ![]() Having so many different bodies offering so many different features has been a huge market advantage, covering the first-time buyers through to the seasoned pros. A sports and wildlife shooter with incredible autofocus, in-body stabilization, and professional video capabilities would be a monumental camera for Canon to bring to market.Ĭanon’s biggest disadvantage right now is the success of its DSLR range, and significantly, its depth. Given the evolution of full frame, bringing all of the advantages of mirrorless to APS-C would see the creation of some amazing cameras consider the excitement if the long-overdue successor to the Canon EOS 7D Mark II were mirrorless. Other software-driven advantages may soon start to emerge, such as Fujifilm’s ability to capture a shot before you even pull the shutter. In-view exposure information is one significant advantage, and intelligent autofocus is even bigger. As detailed in this thought-provoking article from TechCrunch, the biggest area for developments in camera technology is actually software, not hardware, and allowing a camera’s processor to see the scene exactly as it would be captured before the shutter is triggered is a major advantage that mirrorless cameras have over DSLRs. The technology has hit a wall in terms of its limitations and the scope for innovation is now incredibly narrow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |